Why CineStill 400D Is Better Than Kodak Portra 400 For Portraits
Written by: Geve Penaflor
|
|
Time to read 6 min
The world needed a funky, yet versatile color film, and CineStill delivered. Here's why 400Dynamic is the best film stock for portraits, even better than the famous Portra 400.
Something Finally New
As a portrait photographer, CineStill 400D is the best film stock for portraits and street lifestyles, particularly when pitted against the popular Portra 400.
Long ago, the 400 ISO color negative film game was overwhelmingly led by Portra 400 from Kodak. Lomography 400, Fuji Superia, and Ultramax were all present, yet the trend-setting photographers championed the 400-speed Portra series — until CineStill unveiled their 400D.
In the summer of 2022, CineStill announced and released a new color-negative film: CineStill 400 Dynamic, a fine-grain, daylight-balanced film stock with a 400 ISO box speed.
CineStill is also known for its 800T and 50D film stocks, which were motion picture film stock with the ramjet layer removed. According to their website, CineStill states 400D is an entirely new film formula that has never existed before. It is available in 35mm and 120 films and is C-41 processed.
The moment I heard about CineStill 400D, I was pumped. Reviews from my favorite photographers only confirmed what the first images revealed: this film had an unprecedented, captivating quality. I couldn't wait to get my hands on it — and finally, in October, I spotted it in NYC film labs.
Why CineStill 400D Is Better than Kodak Portra 400
When I first started using it, Portra 400 did not satisfy me when shooting on a 35mm camera with a 35mm lens. I had to tinker in the editing process more than necessary, as I prefer to keep post-production at a minimum.
Regarding portraiture, I'm highly selective about the film stock I choose. I look for how it responds to exposure latitude, colors, and aesthetics, and when testing a new film, I want to see how it performs at box speed. Unfortunately, Portra 400 failed to meet my expectations — its colors were flat, the light casts were too neutral, and there was nothing special about the image.
However, my opinion of Portra 400 changed when I started shooting 120 film. The contrast I got in my photos was enough to appreciate, but that was all I could say. I needed something more from 35mm photography, primarily since I used an RB67, which is quite a beast.
These images are from a conceptual shoot I did in November of 2021 with my Mamiya RB67.
I tested how Portra 400 adapted in various lighting situations: a semi-studio setting with one stationary light source and a low light setting with predominantly neon lights serving as additional modifiers. I was pleased with the contrast, especially when underexposed. However, I had to make further color adjustments, leaving me dissatisfied.
San Fransisco on Kodak Portra 400
I continued to test different film stocks, though most were not 400 ISO; for a while, I shot with Lomography Color Negative 100 and 400 ISO for my street portraits. I was pleased with the results I got from LOMO, and despite some of the things I could nitpick about them, I still preferred them over Portra 400 — I avoided Portra 400 for the longest time.
And then, CineStill announced the arrival of 400Dynamic.
I was eager to try out the latest 400D and didn't hesitate to use it on a photo shoot. Taking pictures in NYC's streets with natural lighting was an exciting way to test the roll.
Below are some photos from that shoot with my subject, Princess. The images combine various circumstances — outdoors and indoors, with and without flash— on 35mm and 120 film.
Shot on Kodak Portra 400 120 film
Shot on Kodak Portra 400 35mm
Shot on Kodak Portra 400
Shot on Kodak Portra 400
At first glance, I was not impressed by the 400D. However, upon closer inspection, I quickly realized how unique this film stock is when compared to Portra 400. It produces vibrant images with excellent contrast and bold colors that truly stand out.
Above all — the feature of 400D that's most notable is its beautiful light halation. The roll registered light in a new way, showcasing more versatility than Portra 400 ever could. Although skeptical initially, I was more impressed and intrigued about the 400D than my previous run with Portra 400.
I'm a light chaser in the field, and CineStill 400D revealed itself to be the best fit for my style during its second use.
I eagerly planned a portrait shoot at Elevated Acres in the Financial District of NYC with my subject and friend, Nora, to try something new with my work. I wanted to assess how the film stock performed in direct sunlight during midday, so I seized the opportunity for a one-on-one moment. It was an experiment that yielded remarkable results.
Portra 400 pushed 1 stop (metered at 200 and developed at 800 ISO).
There is something about CineStill 400D that enticed me — it feels like an old stock, and the photos produce a color that feels soft yet palpable.
CineStill 400D's iconic halation gives images an incredible warmth and vibrancy, like the red of Nora's coat jumping off the page. Initially, I doubted this effect would work under direct sunlight, yet it delivered unparalleled sophistication in color and texture without looking flat.
The best part? I barely adjusted any of the values in my CineStill 400D photos.
One of my favorite things about CineStill film, which I've repeatedly found in 400D, is how it reacts to reflecting light. With the halation, light becomes a sparkle; it becomes hot and soft at the same time. It could add a relaxed look to your photos when angled and utilized wisely.
Sometimes, halation can be overwhelming. There were instances when the way CineStill 400D reacts to direct sunlight affected the look of the photo in a mildly distracting way, with the contrast often going overboard; however, it still reserves its character.
Below are photos of my friend Ash in Central Park, shooting CineStill 400D with a 35mm camera.
Portra 400 isn't an insufficient film stock or a lost cause, and CineStill 400D could be more suitable for every idea or situation.
It's critical to comprehend your desired outcome when selecting a film stock to capture the look and feel you want. Portra 400 is a great way to use vibrant colors when exposed and adjusted correctly, and CineStill 400D can utilize saturation and temperature to heighten how an image feels when manipulated accordingly.
Choosing the right film stock will decide the personality and feel of your photos; knowing the lighting conditions beforehand also helps in the decision-making process. It's all about what you're looking for and what works for you.
I still shoot with Portra 400 now and then, and I still appreciate it.
I also believe there's an evolution in every shot you take; I have been shooting film for two years and have learned much since. I recently shot Portra 400 on 35mm in a street portrait of my good friend, Aryn. The lighting condition was close to sundown, and after I scanned my negatives, I had minimal adjustments made.
Here are the results:
Pros
More interesting color profile for my preferences.
Versatile for pushing / pulling.
Cinematic looks.
Less expensive than Kodak Portra 400.
Cons
Harder to find, though pretty popular.
I like it better for portraits, but skin tones aren't as "true-to-life" or as reliable as Kodak Portra 400.
Frequently Asked Questions
What makes Kodak Portra 400 so special?
Natural, accurate skin tones, fine grain for a 400-speed film, and huge exposure latitude—great for portraits, weddings, and travel.
Is Kodak Portra 400 good for beginners?
Yes. It’s forgiving if you slightly miss exposure and scans well, making it easy to learn on.
Should I shoot it at box speed, or overexpose?
Box speed (ISO 400) is great. Many shooters rate at ISO 200–320 to add density and smoother shadows, then develop normal.
Can I push Portra 400?
Yes. Pushing +1 stop (to 800) is common; +2 (to 1600) is doable with more contrast/saturation and potential color shifts. Talk to your lab before pushing.
Can I pull it?
You can pull to 200, but most people simply rate at 200–320 and develop normal. True pull processing lowers contrast and can mute color.
Geve Penaflor
Geve is a NYC-based film photographer who likes to find and meet people and collect their stories through portrait photography.